Search for: "State of Maine v. Graves" Results 41 - 60 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2006, 11:05 am
I am a little late with this post (seeing my sporadic blogging these weeks you might guess what my time schedule looks like), but I wanted to comment on the 20th ratification of the Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980 Convention) of 28 November 2003.With this ratification made on May 12th the protocol, which was concluded by 91 states parties to the Conventional Weapons Convention in 2003, reached its quorum and will enter into force in 6 month from that… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:34 am
The argument here is whether it will be the FDA ultimately that determines whether there was a grave enough risk to modify the label or whether that call will be made by a state court guessing what the FDA would have done, right? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am by Rosalind English
The Secretary of State had two main objections to such an order being made. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:30 am by INFORRM
The Court considered that the allegations that Mr Fuchsmann was involved in gold smuggling, embezzlement and organised crime were sufficiently grave to engage Article 8 [30]. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Thalia Kruger
Both Argentina and Paraguay are Contracting States to the American Convention on Human Rights (or Pact of San José) and the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, which are the main instruments assessed by the Inter-American Court and Commission. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm by INFORRM
Specific reference was made to the aggression against Ukraine and the fact that Russia sought to justify and support that aggression by engaging ‘in continuous and concerted propaganda actions targeted at civil society in the Union and neighboring countries, gravely distorting and manipulating facts’. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:13 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Written by Zuzanna Nowicka, lawyer at the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and lecturer at Department of Logic and Legal Argumentation at University of Warsaw In the aftermath of the judgment of the ICJ of 2012 in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]