Search for: "State of Maryland v. House"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819). [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, Thomas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Maryland and Napue v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Uddin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
New York, 22-1130Issues: (1) Whether a law that prohibits owners from terminating a tenancy at the end of a fixed lease term, except on grounds outside the owner’s control, constitutes a physical taking; and (2) whether allegations that such a law conscripts private property for use as public housing stock, and thereby substantially reduces its value, state a regulatory takings claim. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
I have mixed feelings about new House Speaker Mike Johnson. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Maryland and Napue v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:27 am
Supreme Court granted a property owner’s petition for writ of certiorari in Sheetz v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
While both cases present fascinating issues, the court on Monday denied review in another case raising the same issues about New York’s rent stabilization regime, Community Housing Improvement Program v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm
But in 2021, in TransUnion v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In Powell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
See Doe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 431 (1999), and that he acted “under authority of federal law in the discharge of his duty and only by reason thereof,” Maryland v. [read post]