Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 41 - 60 of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
 The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the district court, remanding for the district court "to address whether the District met its statutory burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Stengrim's conduct was not immune. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:14 am
Hillman of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting in Trenton, recently dismissed a case before her on the grounds that the New Jersey court was an inappropriate place to hear the dispute. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Three churches and their pastors filed suit this week in a Minnesota federal district court challenging the state's COVID-19 limits on worship services. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
State, was decided by the Minnesota Court of Appeals in 2010. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
The Rule defines the statutory term “waters of the United States” in the Clean Water Act, and has been subject to appeals in both federal district courts and courts of appeals. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:18 pm by Christina Phillips
Owners Insurance Company,1 the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently addressed the application of pre-award or pre-judgment interest under Minnesota Law. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:58 am
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment based upon its finding that the underlying claims were excluded by the policy’s broadly worded Product Exclusion. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:30 am by Seth
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to try to stop the spread of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes. [read post]
The Court of Appeals concluded that the court erred by “refusing to apply” binding authority found in State v. [read post]