Search for: "State of Utah v. Law" Results 41 - 60 of 2,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Utah Supreme Court yesterday heard oral arguments (recording of full arguments) in two cases relating to the ongoing efforts of the state of Utah to reform the FLDS United Effort Plan Trust. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Utah courts have attempted to carry out the reforms using non-religious neutral principles of law. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:44 am by Dan Tokaji
Utah State Legislature, concerning whether excessive partisan gerrymandering violates the state constitution. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:00 am by Steve Clowney
Robin Craig (Utah) has posted Does the Endangered Species Act Preempt State Water Law? [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., Aug. 19, 2022), a Utah state trial court issued a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of a provision in Utah law that bans transgender girls from competing on pre-college girls sports teams. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
As reported by Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog, yesterday the state of Utah filed an Application (full text) seeking an immediate stay pending appeal of the Dec. 20 federal district court decision in Kitchen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:02 am by Samuel Franklin
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] struck down part of Utah's anti-bigamy law [statute, text] on Friday in the case of Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, September 6, 2016. [1] Utah v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:50 am
WhenU.com, Inc., 279 F.Supp.2d 723 (E.D.Va.2003)) But the Supreme Court found the cases to be of limited value, given that they interpreted federal statutory laws, not state common law. [read post]