Search for: "State of Washington v. Steven Paul White"
Results 41 - 60
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am
For example, Justice John Paul Stevens, a liberal, strongly condemned the Court’s 1989 decision to allow flag burning in the Texas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said, “a stranger's illegal conduct does not suffice to remove the First Amendment shield from speech about a matter of public concern. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
We had a post by Steven BarnettSimon Neville who has worked for both papers, has written an open letter to Mail editor Paul Dacre. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented, along with John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, and Byron White. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Paul Rosenzweig pointed out that Kasowitz may have violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by reportedly informing White House aides that they did not yet need to hire personal lawyers. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
Likewise, even Supreme Court justices who believe that the government may not endorse religion think that it’s fine for government officials to express religious views in their speeches — here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am
Or, as the Washington Post’s Steven Pearlstein asserted, “[m]any of the D.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:15 am
Writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said, “a stranger’s illegal conduct does not suffice to remove the First Amendment shield from speech about a matter of public concern. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
., an M.B.A. and a J.D. from Washington University in St. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” But in The Washington Post, David Wiegel reports that Sen. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
” At this blog, Mark Walsh reports that retired Justice John Paul Stevens, a longtime Chicago Cubs fan, will be in the stands when the World Series moves to Wrigley Field this weekend. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
Just ask Justices David Souter, Sandra Day O’Connor, and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
Officials involved in the investigation added that they have yet to find any indication that the two gunmen were directed by ISIS, but noted that the shooters were probably inspired by the group, the Washington Post notes. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
This morning’s oral argument in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
” I do believe, as Justice John Paul Stevens has said, it is only because the Court has moved more to the right that he would be viewed as a liberal. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
But officials said legal advisers at the White House, the State Department, the Pentagon and intelligence agencies are now weighing whether the law can be stretched to cover what one former official called “associates of associates. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am
(Kenneth Anderson) The Washington Post has just featured three major consecutive front-page stories on “The Permanent War” – the war on terror (or however one wants to label it), as the US moves from Obama 1 to either an Obama 2 or a Romney administration – and administrations after that. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
And Justice John Paul Stevens, another of the five justices in the Grutter majority, has since been replaced by Justice Elena Kagan, the former Solicitor General who already recused herself from the court's deliberations over whether to even hear the Fisher case. [read post]
