Search for: "State v Bieber"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 1:31 pm
So check out our rousing discussion of the State of the Union v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:20 am
Finally, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in Navarette v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
See State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Cano v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
Because of an ACLU victory in Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
Rebecca Tushnet, The Yes Men and the Women Men Don't SeeI begin with a claim that is likely to be demoralizing, but also reveals some interesting features of privacy: In practice, Americans and many other Westerners care more about privacy as against their neighbors than they do about privacy as against their governments. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
What if my 16-year-old cousin would be sued by teen idol Justin Bieber for reproducing his image and name on any horizontal surface she comes across? [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm
The Court of Appeal itself had said in R v Bieber [2009] 1 WLR 223 that … Schedule 21 of the 2003 Act proceeds on the premise that some crimes are so heinous that they justify imprisoning the offender for the rest of his life, however long that may be. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:38 pm
g=65dd0e09-9f2b-4559-904d-ddb84df6b986 Already, LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:48 pm
RC3, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:29 pm
United States, Don Verrilli, Donald B. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:55 am
The Lanham Act arose in the gamespace during 2009’s James “Jim" Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:57 am
(Eugene Volokh) RC3, the producers of the Joustin’ Beaver game app, are suing Justin Bieber for a declaratory judgment (RC3, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lloyds Tsb Bank Plc v Markandan & Uddin (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 65 (09 February 2012) Foss v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2012] EWCA Civ 80 (09 February 2012) Cambridge v Makin [2012] EWCA Civ 85 (09 February 2012) Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council v Salisbury Independent Living Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 84 (09 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Court, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 133 (09… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
How about getting locked in a room and watching an endless loop of “Fire Fart”, “Chocolate Rain” and “Leave Brittany Alone” with Justin Bieber videos alternating every 20 minutes just to make sure you were watching? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am
US copyright industries show terrific health (Ars Technica) Justin Bieber: streaming bill author should be “locked up” (Ars Technica) FreeBieber campaign is not afraid of Justin Bieber or his lawyers (Ars Technica) MPAA lists “notorious” pirate sites to U.S. government (TorrentFreak) MPAA lashes out against rogue cyberlockers (TorrentFreak) The death of anti-piracy companies and copyright trolls (TorrentFreak) US Copyright – Lawsuits and… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Justin Bieber is not going to jail. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:13 am
The judgment may also be bad news for Mind Candy in a wider sense, as many of their characters are based on other famous popstars, such as Broccoli Spears and Dustbin Beaver, parodies of Britney Spears and teen pop sensation, Justin Bieber. [read post]
