Search for: "State v Dickens" Results 41 - 60 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 3:20 am
Baker is to 21st-century jurisprudence what Dickens' Jarndyce v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Scott Smith has this story in the Stockton Record.The Ninth Circuit today rejected the attack on Arizona's lethal injection protocol in Dickens v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:39 pm
Allstate Insurance Company. /1 Like Dickens' infamous Jarndyce v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  According to the Springfield State Journal-Register, Illinois lawyers have staged a series of mock trials to raise funds to preserve five rare maps and preserve portraits of state supreme court justices. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:52 am
As demonstrated at Geo units in Coke and Dickens Counties, the state already spends a lot of money to oversee its private contracts, and probably needs to spend more. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] Dickens v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:20 am by Terry Hart
(Or, as Lee Gesmer states it, “Filtration for interoperability should be performed ex ante, not ex post. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:36 am by Buce
Gogol's vision is not so much the police state as it is the table of ranks (P and V print one in the intro) where except for the very bottom (and the very top?) [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:34 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Dickens, the Supreme Court of Florida resolved a conflict among various state appellate courts regarding the burden of proof for negligence in a medical malpractice action. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:37 am by SHG
In anticipation of the Supreme Court's hearing Florida v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am by SHG
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]