Search for: "State v Jack Griffin" Results 41 - 51 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
In the ten years following the 1982 outbreak, approximately thirty E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks were recorded in the United States (Griffin & Tauxe, 1991). [read post]
24 May 2008, 6:35 am
Stephen Griffin has a post entitled Text and Principle: Further Thoughts, which replies to Jack Balkin's Text, Principle, and Living Constitutionalism (which in turn replied to Griffin's Can Living Constitutionalism Be Defended?). [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Griffin's complaint centers on the fact that in recent years a cluster of well-known con law theory books have not been reviewed:Consider some of the better contheory books to be published over the last few years:Jack Balkin, What Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
  The most recent development in this dynamic is Jack Balkin's attempt to reconcile originalism with living constitutionalism. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
In a case litigated by Robert Leslie Palmer of Birmingham, Alabama’s Environmental Litigation Group, Griffin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Stephen Griffin, . . . [read post]