Search for: "State v. Andrew C. Holder"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Tyne v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
For example, in Rosalba Alassini v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
This was case C-176/11 HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem dd Nova Gorica, and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sre? [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
This was case C-176/11 HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem dd Nova Gorica, and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sre? [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Reporters without Borders and the National Union of Journalists have contacted by policy holders. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
When made in a federal proceeding or to a federal office or agency, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a federal or state proceeding if:(1) the disclosure is inadvertent; (2) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and (3) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Excluded subject matter Oppo contended that all the claims of the Patent were invalid on the ground of excluded subject matter under s. 1(2)(c) of the Patents Act 1977 (Article 52 EPC). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am
For a successful challenge to a dilutive recapitalization, consider the 2021 decision of New York County Justice Andrew Borrok, 15882 Can., Inc. v Money.Net, Inc., 2021 N.Y. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Andrews, 303 Ky. 46, 196 S.W.2d 473 (Ky.1946); 20 Am.Jur.2d, Cotenancy and Joint Ownership, Section 22. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Andrew P. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm
” The SEC found that notwithstanding “[t]he lack of monetary consideration for purportedly ‘free’ shares,” the issuance of the TOM tokens as a “gift” of a security through the Bounty Program constituted a “sale” or “offer to sell” within the meaning of the Securities Act as stated in SEC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:07 am
By Andrew DelaneyPrue v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
All Section 103 of SOPA does is give copyright holders a new tool to more effectively protect their work from commercial misappropriation. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
See, e.g., Report at 13 n.22; C-SPAN at 2:10:50. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Apixaban (1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7-oxo-6-[4-(2-oxopiperidin-1-yl)phenyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridin-3-carbamide) The patent is unopposed. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
