Search for: "State v. Andrew C. Holder"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Holderness, Boston College, on Monday, August 29, 2016 Tags: Blockholders, Capital markets, Engagement, Firm performance, Institutional Investors, Management, Ownership, Property rights,Public firms, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting We Have a Consensus on Fraud on the Market—And It’s Wrong Posted by James C. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
See Messer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Is it a C-level accountability and part of the day-to-day business focus? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Tyne v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
Andrew Greenan will also attend. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
When made in a federal proceeding or to a federal office or agency, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a federal or state proceeding if:(1) the disclosure is inadvertent; (2) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; and (3) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Rule 26(c) would state that a court could issue a protective order allocating discovery expenses. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
C. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
But every now and then there could be a problem with a right holder wielding copyright in an effort to prevent interoperability, just like there are standard-essential patent (SEP) owners, like Google, who pursue injunctions. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:07 am
By Andrew DelaneyPrue v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
He argues that “what Georgia — and other states — have done since” the Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
This was case C-176/11 HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem dd Nova Gorica, and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sre? [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
This was case C-176/11 HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem dd Nova Gorica, and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sre? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
Moore, Yi Ni v. [read post]
