Search for: "State v. Angel T." Results 41 - 60 of 3,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2009, 11:42 pm
An editorial at the Los Angeles Times states of the consitutional provision on copyright/patent in the context of the Fairey matterThe framers of the Constitution were so concerned about that incentive that they gave Congress the power to grant inventors and authors exclusive rights over their works in order to "promote the progress of science and the useful arts. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:24 pm
It doesn't constitute a violation of the Establishment Clause to remove a cross from your state symbol. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:16 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
Additional Resources: State Farm Auto Accident Claims in California (Los Angeles Injury Lawyer Blog)   Jury Award of $113,000 After Farmers Insurance Group Settlement Offer of $4,000 Mego v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:00 pm
Reading between the lines: "Qualified immunity appeals are difficult enough without the district court making it harder by merely stating: 'Motion denied.' When that's all we see, we can't tell if it's an insufficiency of the evidence problem (for which appeals are not available) or otherwise. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:03 am by Nassiri Law
The state already has a minimum wage, but it has become increasingly clear that state minimum wage does not equate to a living wage for the residents and workers in Los Angeles. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:50 pm by Steven M. Taber
Aviation statutes specifically state that “[t]he United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:22 am by lpcprof
Jay Dougherty, Loyola Law School (Los Angeles), is publishing Now You Own it, Now You Don’t — Or Do You? [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am by Nassiri Law
Dep’t of Defense, December 7, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:29 am by Steve Baird
Aren’t these Victoria’s Secret DREAM ANGELS registrations (here, here, and here) covering related goods? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
California’s Second Appellate District has affirmed a trial court’s order which interpreted AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
A recent case out of Washington State decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- Ocampo v. [read post]