Search for: "State v. Arden" Results 41 - 60 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 9:29 pm
As such, it is not a state agency for the purposes of state action immunity, the AAA argued.The brief is Shames v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The majority of the Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows) allow Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
Lady Justice Arden gave the lead judgment, with which there was unanimous judicial consent. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm by NL
Nzamy v Brent London Borough Council Court of Appeal, January 26, 2011 [Arden eflash 420. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
Mich-Onyibe v Wandsworth LBC (04/11/08, CA, judgment currently unavailable otherwise than by way of e-flash from Arden Chambers) is a kind of a curious footnote to homelessness law. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
v)              Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
The respondents pointed out that in AAA v Associated Newspapers  and Weller v Associated Newspapers; children have been awarded damages despite being oblivious to their privacy rights being violated. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am by Dominic Pugh
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Spencer v Taylor [2013] EWCA Civ 1600This case was flagged recently on the Arden Chambers eflash service. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Spencer v Taylor [2013] EWCA Civ 1600This case was flagged recently on the Arden Chambers eflash service. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]