Search for: "State v. Arden"
Results 41 - 60
of 231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 10:55 pm
Throwing in the useful case of Regina v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:42 pm
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor [2018] UKSC 51 It is not every day you see the Supreme Court setting HMO licence conditions, but today is that day. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:56 pm
A sign of how parlous the state of funding is within local authorities these days. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
Case Comment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
The dissenting judgment of Arden LJ Arden LJ took a different view. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:32 pm
If anything, the recent Supreme Court judgment on indirect discrimination by a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) in Essop and others (Appellants) v Home Office (UK Border Agency) (Respondent) Naeem (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) (2017) UKSC 27 might have made such a claim more straightforward to bring. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Because “benefits tourism” and the burden on the state must be reduced, like Arden LJ it was “impossible” for Lord Carnwath to hold that the objectives underpinning the regulations fell outside the wide margin of discretion allowed to national governments in this field. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 5:57 am
(citing Arden v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
The post Homelessness & Allocations by Arden, Bates and Vanhegan appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
The Court of Appeal’s position, in a judgment given by Arden LJ, was that the current entitlements for Zambrano carers are lawful. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Limoges, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Last week in the Courts There was a successful application for permission to appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker on 5 April 2017 heard by Arden LJ. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Giving the judgment of the court, Arden LJ held that there was no violation of ECHR, art 14 (read with art 8). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 6:15 am
Nonetheless, the Court of Appeal in Lady Arden’s judgment expressly confirms that this is the case. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm
The case for argument today is Georgia v. [read post]
