Search for: "State v. Armes" Results 41 - 60 of 11,295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am by Just Security
Criminal Responsibility for Organized Armed Groups by Rogier Bartels (@RogierBartels) Immigration Law and Policy Why Trump v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
  Here, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) and its then-Superintendent Maria Vullo made clear their intent to harm the advocacy efforts of the National Rifle Association (NRA) by strong-arming consent decrees from insurance broker Lockton Cos. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
Without representation from an attorney, Granier filed his own petition for review from the state prison in Angola, Louisiana, arguing, in Granier v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
The orders reflect the changing conditions, such as the armed conflict and the blockade. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
Starvation as a Method of Warfare In his statement, the Prosecutor assessed that the conflict in Gaza and Israel that began on October 7, 2023 comprises both an international armed conflict (IAC) between Israel and Palestine and a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) between Israel and Hamas (together with other Palestinian armed groups). [read post]
28 May 2024, 2:20 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Israel) at the International Court of Justice Miłosz Gapsa, Broadening the Bindingness of the Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]