Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 41 - 60 of 41,553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Live testimony of a vocational expert can occur only on a showing of good cause [ see [b], below ]. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Sherica Celine
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Law Firm Rates Tracker (Debtor Professionals Mega Bankruptcies) Debtor Professionals Mega Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
  Although TUPE refers to “employees”, the definition was cast into doubt by the case of Dewhurst v Revisecatch Ltd (t/a Ecourier) in which the Employment Tribunal held that workers satisfying the wider definition in section 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 are within the scope of TUPE and not just to employees. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
*  When Lawyer A opens the file using the link, he or she discovers the link provides access to B's client's documents which were not expected to be disclosed and are likely to be considered confidential.This is what happened in a recent case in New York called Pursuit Credit Special Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Amber M. Rogers, Keenan Judge
Circuit”) partially overturned a decision issued by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) in Absolute Healthcare d/b/a Curaleaf Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]