Search for: "State v. Bach" Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
It is true that this exception is  recognized by article 5.3(f) of the Copyright Directive which states that Member States may provide for exceptions or limitations to the reproduction right for “incidental inclusion of a work or other subject-matter in other material. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:58 am
Second, Magistrate Judge Facciola’s reasoning appears to be in significant tension with an Eight Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:00 am by Jason Rantanen
By Sarah Burstein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Pacific Coast Marine Windshields, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:35 am by Kurt J. Schafers
Bache & Co., 358 F.2d 178, 182 (2d Cir. 1966).In support of his argument that bad faith was required, the petitioner cited several SEC decisions and the Second Circuit’s decision in Buchman v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:47 am by Robert Trautmann
Recently, my colleagues Larry Bache and Ashley Smith posted about Hunt v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
In Bach and Bach Flower Remedies Trade Marks [2000] RPC 513 members of the public had been called at trial and these witnesses had been identified as a result of a survey of 9,500 people. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:59 am by Mark Zamora
(“”Sears”) (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (styled Steve Chambers, Lynn Van Der Veer, David Brown, Bach-Tuyet Brown, Kevin O’Donnell, Joseph Cicchelli, Kurt Himler, Susan Milicia, Gary LeBlanc and James Cashman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Yo-Yo Ma “plays” the Cello Suite No. 1 when he draws the bow across his cello strings to audibly reproduce the notes that Bach inscribed. [read post]