Search for: "State v. Basile"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm
Basile, No. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm
Basile, No. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
[FN3] Moreover, defendant has not established that he would have agreed to accept Bradley’s settlement offer at any time, or that but for plaintiff’s negligence, he would have or has negotiated a more favorable monetary settlement (see Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 406 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Development, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
CONCERNED ABOUT LOUISIANA PLAN TO CUT HOME MEDICAID SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
Basile, 141 AD3d 405 (2016)(holding summary judgment dismissing [*5]the legal malpractice claim appropriately granted where the asserted damages are vague, unclear, or speculative); Bellinson Law, LLC v Iannucci, 102 AD3d 563 (1st Dept 2013)]. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:00 am
Aldrich v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am
Not in Drasche v Edelman & Edelman, P.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:12 pm
Basile v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Increase the basic state pension, by relinking it to earnings, and protect the winter fuel allowance, free TV licences, free bus travel and other key benefits for older people. 5. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
LLP v Basile, 141AD3d405, 405 [1st Dept 2016].) [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:09 pm
CARMONA, Appellants, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
The state's highest court upheld the state Court of Appeals' 2011 ruling that Fond du Lac County officials improperly committed "Helen E.F. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., as Subrogee of RENEE M. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am
“[M]ere speculation of a loss resulting from an attorney’s alleged omissions . . . is insufficient to sustain a claim” for legal malpractice” (Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 405-406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
