Search for: "State v. Battaglia"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
” Sandler playfully tangled with Battaglia over her decision in Griffin v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:33 am
In Peviani v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
In Hill v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
This simple fact renders Claude v Elgammal ;2011 NY Slip Op 50024(U) ; Decided on January 14, 2011 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Battaglia, J. all the more shocking. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Eleven Additional Members of Congress Brief in opposition Title: United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 8:32 am
In Vinokur v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
State, 15 Ark. 204 (1854) and State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am
(See Scott v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am
Justice Battaglia discusses his take on whether a case in Hawaii, with a NY plaintiff and a NY attorney might fall under Judiciary Law 487. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:31 am
Today the Court of Appeals of Maryland issued its opinion in Grady v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
Battaglia, Kings County Supreme Court explain: ""[A] client may at anytime, with or without cause, discharge an attorney. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:22 pm
Battaglia, writing for a unanimous Maryland Court of Appeals decision, found that Maryland law, like most other states, is that expert vocational testimony is not required to determine industrial loss. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
Dunne v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
When the ticket was first reported, it was a mere curiosity, since Milgram's predecessor, Zulima V. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:22 pm
Battaglia, No. 06-3257 (7th Cir. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:00 pm
" The case is Conaway v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
Battaglia, whose dissent was joined by Chief Judge Robert M. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
Ed. 2d at 696, quoting United States v. [read post]
