Search for: "State v. Bayer"
Results 41 - 60
of 690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2021, 4:26 am
The long-running saga of Bayer v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
’” Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 1:23 pm
The relators accused Bayer Corp. and Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
Examples of such misfortune include the ‘Aspirin’ for acetylsalicylic acid in the United States (Bayer Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
In this study, we examine the impact of the gender discrimination lawsuit Pao v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
Not since the FLANAX case (Bayer v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:37 pm
Andrea Picciotti-Bayer is the director of the Conscience Project and previously was the legal adviser to the Catholic Association. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 3:04 am
The first major verdict resulting from these claims was in 2018 in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:54 pm
On 7 January 2021, Facebook suspended the account of Donald Trump, President of the United States for an indefinite period. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
The district court also erred in declining to consider whether Bayer’s filing of a petition with the USPTO to cancel Belmora’s FLANAX registration tolled the statute of limitations applicable to its California state-law unfair competition and false advertising claims The case was remanded for the district court to determine whether Bayer’s Section 43(a) claims were barred by laches, whether its state-law claims were time-barred, and to make any… [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am
The district court also erred in declining to consider whether Bayer’s filing of a petition with the USPTO to cancel Belmora’s FLANAX registration tolled the statute of limitations applicable to its California state-law unfair competition and false advertising claims The case was remanded for the district court to determine whether Bayer’s Section 43(a) claims were barred by laches, whether its state-law claims were time-barred, and to make any… [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Singh considers two cases, Bayer v Natco and Novartis AG v Union of India, to see how compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals and evergreening of patents are dealt with by the Indian judiciary.Part VII “Lores of IP during wartime”Arpan Banerjee and Dana Beldiman, in Chapter 14, “International Trade Mark Enforcement Under the Versailles Treaty: A Case Study of Sanatogen”, discuss how the Bombay High Court applied IP-related provisions of the… [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:55 am
Let’s start with the new 11th Circuit case, Hubbard v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog reported on the case of Bayer v Richter/Exeltis which seems to change this understanding. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:04 am
The judgment of the CJEU in C-688/17 (Bayer v Richter/Exeltis) upon a referral by the Metropolitan Court of Budapest (Hungary) seems to change this earlier understanding. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:02 am
Decision issued September 8, 2020: “Goren v Barnett” — “From 2010 to approximately 2013, the law firm of Amstein & Lehr LLP (Arnstein & Lehr) represented the Regional Center as securities counsel in various matters related to its EB-5 program administered by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Bayer, in which Section 43(a) was read to provide a cause of action to a plaintiff whose pleaded trademark had never been used in the United States). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
Introduction In 1998, Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a sweeping overhaul of U.S. copyright law notionally designed to update the system for the digital era. [read post]
