Search for: "State v. Beene"
Results 41 - 60
of 125,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In United States v Stitt, decided on December 10, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:38 pm
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:48 am
Regina (Lumba (Congo)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Same v Same (No 2); Regina (Mighty (Jamaica)) v Same; [On appeal from Regina (WL (Congo)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department] [2011] UKSC 12;; [2011] WLR (D) 100 ”The unlawful exercise by the Secretary of State of the power to detain foreign national prisoners gave rise to a private law action for the tort of false… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Under United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:14 am
AL (Albania) v Secretary for State the Home Department; FN (Gambia) v Same; DN(Bangladesh) v Same: [2012] EWCA Civ 710; [2012] WLR (D) 16 “In statutory appeals to the Court of Appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), if the appeal had been allowed by consent, with the appellant obtaining the remittal sought, or if the appeal had been resolved by the grant of a status which was not previously… [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Watkins v United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957), the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for… [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:58 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:13 am
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:36 am
State of Utah: Opinion Briefs: Hackford Brief State Brief Uintah Brief This Hackford has been before the Tenth Circuit several times before, here, here, and here. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 2:24 pm
The post ANTHONY GREEN v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:02 am
Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families v Fletcher; Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14; [2011] WLR (D) 114 “It was objectively justified, under regulation 8 of the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002, for the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families to employ teachers on a succession of fixed-term contracts for secondment to European… [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:14 pm
Our Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:49 am
Abdirahman v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Abdirahman v Leicester City Council and another: Ullusow v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions “When considering applications made by EU and EEA nationals living in the United Kingdom for social security benefits who were neither economically active nor self-sufficient, lawful presence in the United Kingdom was not to be equated with a "right to reside" within the meaning of… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
State, 982 S.W.2d 904 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998), been undermined by the Court's subsequent decision in Hall v. [read post]
