Search for: "State v. Belt"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Dominic Choate v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am
The state appeals court affirmed, relying on Geier v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:28 am
State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:50 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:39 pm
Co. v Belt Parkway Imaging, P.C., 2010 NY Slip Op 08783 (1st Dept. 2010) “Section 5109(a) states, “The superintendent, in consultation with the commissioner of health and the commissioner of education, shall by regulation, promulgate standards and procedures for investigating and suspending or removing the authorization for providers of health [...] [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:57 am
Additionally, CDC data states more than half of people who were killed in a motor vehicle collision in 2009 were not wearing a seat belt. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
Second, the court stated that the Sheriff's Department wanted defendant to wear the stun belt. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:47 am
Most states now require seat belt use by adults riding in the back of the car [USA Today] Tags: nanny state, seatbelts Related posts Updates – June 20 (2) Update: Rose Marie Munoz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:29 pm
On September 24, 2012, when Reggie was four years old, Ward struck Reggie repeatedly with a belt or cord on the child’s head, ears and back. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:13 pm
In the case of Halum et. al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:58 am
Rebecca Woodman won in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
This was the plaintiff’s theory of the underlying case at issue in Stokes v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:19 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:55 am
If you want to read about a large number of issues in federal criminal law in one place, you should check out United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:40 am
Co. v Belt Parkway Imaging, P.C., 33 AD3d 407, 409 [2006]), this would be an absurd result, and we reject it (Statutes § 145). [read post]
