Search for: "State v. Bickell" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:13 am by Steve Vladeck
In light of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari yesterday to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Briefly: This blog continues its symposium on the fiftieth anniversary of Alexander Bickel’s The Least Dangerous Branch with posts by Michael Seidman and Kathryn Watts. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:02 pm
Mooting the issues leaves the law of executive emergency powers in the state of twilight uncertainty that Jackson praised in Korematsu, and allows the administration to fight another day in better circumstances -- the same plan that the Court followed after Reconstruction and after Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am by Guest Blogger
  The Government, borrowing from Alexander Bickel, invites the Court to issue a more minimal ruling. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wechsler and Bickel were hardly alone among the liberal professoriate. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
The editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to grant review in Shaygan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:39 pm
Entitled "Finding Bickel Gold in a Hill of Beans," I urged Congress and state legislators to do more to clean up the lethal injection mess. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
Brewer III, name partner at Bickel & Brewer. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
” *John Nieman suggests that the Court’s single-sentence denial of the states’ petitions may be the perfect book-end to its single-sentence denial of the first same-sex marriage claim in 1972: “With forty years of hindsight, the Court’s one-liner saying effectively nothing in Baker v. [read post]