Search for: "State v. Bird" Results 41 - 60 of 1,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One Petition for certiorari was filed on 7/3/23: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Whitney Gravelle
” The spill killed fish, birds, turtles, and other animals, and devastated thousands of acres of rivers and forest. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Murphy v Certain2023 NY Slip Op 02978Decided on June 06, 2023Appellate Division, First Department “The court properly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In summer 2020, while walking her dog in Central Park, a white woman saw a black man who was bird-watching. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] In 2016, Google received a copy of a Miami-Dade County default judgment in MergeworthRX, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
It is important to establish and enforce a strong, state-of-the-art anti-harassment policy. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Many other states, including California, Nebraska, Illinois, and Florida, have similar statutes. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Outlining his approach, Wood Ch. observed: “[15] …the problem complained of has denied them the opportunity of maintaining the grave in a dignified and respectful state despite their best endeavours. [read post]