Search for: "State v. Brazile"
Results 41 - 60
of 796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
Secretary of State for Defence [2008] EWHC 3098 (Admin), paras 89 et seq, and followed obiter in R (Al-Saadoon) v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
See Laguna v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:12 am
Yet, in another recent (and still pending) case before the state court of Rio de Janeiro, i.e. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:58 pm
In Sulamerica CIA Nacional de Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWHC 42 (Comm), Mr Justice Cooke held that an anti-suit injunction restraining the defendant insureds from pursuing proceedings in Brazil in breach of an arbitration clause would be continued. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:48 pm
On February 23, 2007, in the matter of the State of São Paulo of the Federative Republic of Brazil v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:15 am
This focus is particularly alarming for international companies with subsidiaries in Brazil because Brazil’s IP royalty remittance laws directly conflict with the United State’s transfer pricing policies. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) recently agreed to hear the case South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 7:44 pm
The article states: Commerce secretary G.K. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:47 am
V, U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Brazil v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 6:40 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et. al., saw the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) consider an appeal of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina’s denial of Lenovo’s request for an antisuit injunction, preventing Ericsson from enforcing injunctions in Colombia and Brazil. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 6:40 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et. al., saw the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) consider an appeal of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina’s denial of Lenovo’s request for an antisuit injunction, preventing Ericsson from enforcing injunctions in Colombia and Brazil. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court decision in Bremen v Zapata Off-Shore Co. (1972). [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:19 pm
[Brazil][Habitual residence][Petition denied] In Soares v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Sugarloaf Funding LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:47 pm
Brazil v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
See, e.g., Blockowicz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
The State shall always be responsible for expropriations decreed by itself or through its agents. [read post]
