Search for: "State v. Bruce"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 2:35 pm
Dolan & Helen V. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Bruce Babbitt, a Democrat. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm
—Mark Twain 1Theodore v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The defamation trial brought by Bruce Lehrmann continues. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Rev. 1219 (1993); Bruce A. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The case at issue – Moore v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm
“Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Bruce Lehrmann has been revealed as the “high-profile” man accused of raping a woman in Toowoomba two years ago. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:16 pm
Anybody interested in reading the full text of our "originalist" brief should go to https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and then search for the name "Bruce Ackerman". [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
Bruce AckermanIn Moore v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:15 am
From People v. [read post]
