Search for: "State v. Butterfly" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2017, 3:27 am by Alex Potcovaru
Luis Moreno Ocampo reviewed Catherine MacKinnon’s new book Butterfly Politics. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The text has remained unchanged through to the April 2009 version currently in force) state that “a presentation of information defined solely by the content of the information is not patentable” and that “the arrangement or manner of representation, as distinct from the information content, may well constitute a patentable technical feature”. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
*           *           *“Meet the scientist who’s been counting California butterflies for 47 years and has no plans to stop,” by Deborah Netburn for the Los Angeles Times (November 12, 2019). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:12 am
Instead, Eugene took an enormous risk by posting a link to his oral argument (he started @39 minutes in) before the Nebraska Supreme Court, where he represented the defendant, pro bono, in a criminal/First Amendment case, State v, Drahota. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Gore are unlikely to return to the Court with its “hanging chads” and “butterfly ballots. [read post]
Indeed, such clarification may be necessary given that at least one more insect (the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly) listing is pending before the Commission, with more likely to follow. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
Some caterpillars change into butterflies; others become litigants. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”              There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]