Search for: "State v. C. K."
Results 41 - 60
of 2,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Instagram, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm
c. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:03 am
, McGrew v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm
Supreme Court in Google v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
”[16] However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Seth C. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Little v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm
The term is broadly defined by Cornell Law School, citing Fischer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In StarNet Insurance Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Another is Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484, 10 N.Y.S.3d 2 [read post]
