Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 41 - 60
of 37,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
Curio’s interest in continuing distribution must yield to this. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Connelly v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Google, Ynfante v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
She received a California County Counsels’ Litigation Award for preparing an amicus brief on behalf of the California State Association of Counties in Elisa B. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am
Voyeurism is covered under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:11 am
§ 30:2383.10.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
Accordingly, in a Resolution of 18 January 2024, the Parliament positively welcomed the Commission’s initiative and urged the Member States to make progress on it. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am
(Young v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” In Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm
United States and reassess the definition of a “crime of violence” under 18 US Code § 924(c)(3). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
Hishon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
But then s.167 – no re-entry or forfeiture for small amounts, expressly states “long lease” has the meaning given by sections 76 and 77 of this Act, except that a shared ownership lease is a long lease whatever the tenant’s total share, And, of course, forfeiture doesn’t apply to an assured tenancy, as it is expressly ruled out by Housing Act 1988. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Rev. 1009 (2024).Christopher C. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:22 pm
The Court has also allowed 1226(c) to permit prolonged detentions in Jennings v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
The trial court admitted evidence that the government had knowingly failed to disclose Gladys Mobley’s connection and denied the state’s motion to dismiss Granier’s petition. [read post]
