Search for: "State v. CJS"
Results 41 - 60
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 8:54 pm
CJ Effron then jumped in with an unrelated question. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 10:04 pm
Oshkosk Corp., No. 14-CV-6513-CJS, 2019 U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:18 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm
As opposed to the State, a criminal defendant has no right to immediately appeal a circuit court's decision not to suppress evidence and has no right to pursue a cross-appeal in a State's appeal under CJ section 12-302(c)(3). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
.* (Davis v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
In August, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:50 am
But in the other corner, weighing in with Judges Watford (joined by CJ Kozinski, Paez and Bea), is a dissental, also a great read. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
[The DHS Secretary erred because she rescinded the entire DACA policy, rather than just the parts CJ Roberts suggested might be unlawful] Yesterday, I posted my high-level analysis of DHS v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
CJ Shepard dissents with opinion: J Sullivan dissents with opinion in which CJ Shepard joins. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
Jones v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
Case C- 191/18, KN v Minister for Justice and Equality, is not about PIL; the questions referred to the CJ on March 16, actually relate to the European Arrest warrant (and Brexit). [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
The decline of the past two years was the result of a reduction in appeals from administrative agency decisions involving the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), as well as decreases in criminal appeals and federal prisoner petitions brought about by the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 11:30 pm
There is a gun case - NY State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
In a string of decisions from Underhill v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
"Creat[ing]" an "outlaw" has a different sort of connotation than creating a law which makes conduct illegal -- and I take it that the Chief is relying on this distinction, but I'm not sure I understand what he means precisely. The Chief goes on to rely on New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
As Justice Calogero notes in his OpEd, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:28 pm
Yesterday, June 6, 2011, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Nelson v. [read post]
