Search for: "State v. Child"
Results 41 - 60
of 20,887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Furthermore, the Romanian procedure cannot be considered compatible with EU law, as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights X. and Y. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
No one was arguing in the Idaho case that EMTALA codifies Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule V drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
Stated that way, Section 230’s applicability is obvious. [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:34 am
Bienvenu v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
The Arizona State House took up and passed the bill to repeal the ban, HB2677, two weeks following the state Supreme Court’s ruling, sending the bill to the State Senate. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
Gluckman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]