Search for: "State v. Class"
Results 41 - 60
of 28,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
See Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:03 pm
State of Utah. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 2:37 pm
Jimenez v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:59 am
9 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
See State of Tennessee v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Regarding mutuality, the Order states: “In light of [AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
Check out the video below, and also our website to see if you may have claims to initiate a class action lawsuit under Federal or New York State law. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
In Seeligson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:07 pm
Riley Takeaways: In Palacios v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
The case is called Brooks v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm
In January 2023, a federal district court in Texas dismissed Michael v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
In Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:53 pm
A flurry of recent consumer protection cases in California federal courts led to mixed results for defendants attempting to dismiss nationwide class claims based on the state’s choice of law rules. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:39 am
” Spencer v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
In Langan v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
Chandler v Camden London Borough Council; Chandler v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] EWHC 219 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 58 “A parent of school age children could not be classed as an ‘economic operator’ and did not therefore have sufficient standing under European and domestic rules on public procurement to bring a [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
Anyway, the case is State of Nevada v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
See Haney v. [read post]
