Search for: "State v. Clausing"
Results 41 - 60
of 28,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2024, 9:59 am
The contracting officer responded stating that under FAR Clause (FAR 52.249.10) dealing with fixed priced contracts, epidemics (such as Covid-19) that impact the critical path will entitle the contractor to a no-cost extension of time and the government grants the contractor a 66-day extension of time. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm
Colorado in Mapp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:06 pm
Reading Moore v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am
That language originally appeared in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:43 am
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
Inazu The key precedent for the current legislation, Stone v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:44 pm
There are legal challenges against the rule, including Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 1:41 pm
American Humanists Association, and the 2005 case Van Orden v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
From Stein v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
’” In Labrador v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:46 am
By contrast, the forum selection clause discussed in Ware Else, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Statute stating that “any judgment . . . shall . . . bear post-judgment interest” requires interest on entire judgment, including any portion consisting of pre-judgment interest. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:19 am
The Romers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:19 am
–Martell v. [read post]