Search for: "State v. Clinton" Results 41 - 60 of 2,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
He filed suit against: The Nevada Secretary of State The Nevada State Democratic Party Hillary Rodham Clinton I don’t practice in Nevada but I think he forgot to name reason, common sense, and the 14th amendment to the Constitution as defendants. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 1:34 pm by Derek T. Muller
Wash. 16-cv-01886) voluntarily dismissed; state administrative appeal to Thurston County Superior Court, Docket No. 17-2-02446-34; Guerra v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)  Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:09 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Clinton that the political question doctrine does not bar judicial review of the constitutionality of a federal statute that requires the Secretary of State to designate "Israel" as the country of... [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by Bill Amadeo
Amidst the drama that is the 2016 Presidential Election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, I scanned my television late on Saturday night and then came the documentary “15 to Life” which despite exhaustion keep me tuned in. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 8:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
“We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community, we’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe V. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by Kevin Sheerin
  In the Matter of Eastern Oaks Development v Town of Clinton, et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
USDA indicated at the time, "In simultaneously upholding and overturning the 2001 Clinton roadless rule, the courts have created confusion and made it difficult for the U.S. [read post]