Search for: "State v. Conklin"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
In Conklin, one of the decedent’s two attorneys-in-fact, Lori Conklin (“Lori”) sold his cooperative apartment while he was residing in a nursing or rehabilitation facility. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
In Conklin, one of the decedent’s two attorneys-in-fact, Lori Conklin (“Lori”) sold his cooperative apartment while he was residing in a nursing or rehabilitation facility. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Each passing year brings more appellate court decisions, at the state and federal levels, addressing arbitration. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:30 pm
Flood & Conklin Mfg. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:50 am
Flood and Conklin Mfg. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:50 am
Flood and Conklin Mfg. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:30 am
Flood & Conklin Mfg. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:57 pm
Conklin, 63 M.J. 333, 337 (C.A.A.F. 2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 10:24 am
Flood & Conklin Mfg. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:14 am
Referring to the reasoning in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:00 pm
Flood & Conklin Mfg. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:52 am
– Wal-Mart v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:46 am
Before Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
However, due to the questionable holding of the United States Supreme Court in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
As to the first prong, "[a]n attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legal research" (Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007). [read post]
