Search for: "State v. Coughlin"
Results 41 - 60
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
(holding that a police commissioner is a public official); Coughlin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:57 am
In Jacobson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
McKinney School of Law, Christine Nero Coughlin, Wake Forest University – School of Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:34 am
Coughlin, 58 F.3d 865 (2d Cir. 1995). [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am
See Our Lady of Guadalupe Sch. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
” The lawsuit, New York et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 6:17 am
" In 1996, the Second Circuit held in Jolly v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am
Bostock v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the matter to the lower court for further proceedings.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, aff'd 63 NY2d 643, the Appellate Division opined that threatening to do what the appointing authority has a right to do – in this instance filing disciplinary charges against Rychlick if he refused to resign from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the matter to the lower court for further proceedings.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, aff'd 63 NY2d 643, the Appellate Division opined that threatening to do what the appointing authority has a right to do – in this instance filing disciplinary charges against Rychlick if he refused to resign from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
In 2012, per the agreement, Flink sold 7.5 shares to each of Dominelli and Coughlin. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:13 am
In Colon v. [read post]
