Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
The California Supreme Court should grant review of this Court of Appeal opinion. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
The Appellate Division of the Singapore High Court has recently refused permission to appeal against the first instance decision.[13] It bears pointing out that the same issue of ownership of the assets of the DC Funds was before the BVI court in the insolvency proceedings. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ AMA v FTC case from 1980). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
The appeals court reversed that decision. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Ellen appealed (you can read the appeal briefs here, here, and here). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
McCraw, also known as United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
That is, the entire record is open for review ( State Comp. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court’s Muldrow v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
The General Court’s decision The General Court dismissed the opponent’s appeal (case T-117/23). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am
The Fourth Department Affirms In a one-line decision dated March 15, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department affirmed Justice Walker’s dismissal “for reasons stated at Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
The Court of Appeals seemingly rejected this “sniff plus” approach in the recent case of State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
I am very familiar with this limbo, as the Defense Distributed case is stuck somewhere between the Garden State and the Lone Star State. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
The most glaring example is a Rehnquist Court decision--Bush v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:57 am
On April 3, 2024, in the case of Li v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:04 am
I can say that because I just won a case in the federal court of appeals — and now before the Supreme Court — that shows that he started censoring not just me but, 37 hours after he took the oath of office, he was censoring me (sic). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Randal Hall of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Statesboro Division granted Walmart’s motion for summary judgment in Walmart Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
