Search for: "State v. Crisp" Results 41 - 60 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Ginsburg Tapes (podcast), Lauren Moxley analyzes Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1976 oral argument in Califano v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
This was because the application form for the Community plant variety right stated that the Cripps Pink apple trees were first marketed within the European Union (in France) in 1994 and first marketed outside the European Union (in Australia) in 1988. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm by Jennifer Hillman
As a result, the ability to achieve a resolution can be affected by the quality of the reasoning, the crispness of the panel recommendations and the willingness of the parties to conform their measures to the panel report. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The City of Los Angeles, the State of California, indeed the United States of America had all been changed by his life, in ways both subtle and dramatic. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
But I also believe, and it's personal -- and I was actually very -- it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Although the postal service has been declared a non-person, today’s decision cannot detract from the federal agency’s heartwarming role in the landmark case of State of New York v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Overall, Biskupic’s crisp biography lives up to its uniformly positive reviews. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
Lady Hale identified two IP cases which stuck in the mind because of their real world applicability.The first was a case about gas burners (Sabaf v MFI [2004] UKHL 45 covered on the IPKat here) straightforward subject matter means it sticks in the mind - similar to the crisp packet problem she encountered in the Court of Appeal...Is it a sculpture? [read post]