Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
This approach is supported by the relevant CPS guidance (entitled ‘Sending Indictable Only Cases to the Crown Court and committal Proceedings’, dated 22 November 2007) which state “(t)here is currently no provision for sending defendants to the Crown Court in their absence”. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:32 pm
At trial and on appeal, the Federal Court held that if the State health purchasing authorities with which Baxter was dealing were entitled to Crown immunity, Baxter was entitled to 'derivative' Crown immunity and was protected from the proceedings brought by the ACCC. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
In fact, the United States Fifth Circuit previously determined that the same exact gambling boat, the M/V Crown, was not a vessel. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:47 am
R. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
Show Notes: Copyright ActStanding Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Copyright ReviewLibrary and Archival Community Letter on Crown CopyrightKeatley Surveying v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 2:56 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) GG Plc, R v (No.2) [2008] EWCA Crim 3061 (18 December 2008) Moyle v R [2008] EWCA Crim 3059 (18 December 2008) Tucker v Crown Prosecution Service [2008] EWCA Crim 3063 (19 December 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) F & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [...] [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
Delaware, involving the proposed Crown Landing LNG terminal, is not likely to affect the status of LNG terminals proposed in Oregon across the Columbia River from the state of Washington. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Fox v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 653 (02 April 2009) Pola v The Crown (Health and Safety Executive) [2009] EWCA Crim 655 (07 April 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWCA [...] [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:35 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Balshaw v Crown Prosecution Service [2009] EWCA Crim 470 (18 March 2009) Harvey v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 469 (18 March 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor v Bleaklow Industries Ltd & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 206 (18 March 2009) Associated British Ports [...] [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:14 am
Yet, on that fact, I will now remark, since the Fourth Circuit recently decided United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
While Brown is still widely celebrated as the “crown jewel of the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:35 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Public & Commercial Services Union, R (on the application of) v Minister for the Civil Service [2010] EWHC 1027 (Admin) (10 May 2010) BX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 990 (Admin) (10 May 2010) S v Northampton Crown Court & Anor [2010] EWHC 723 (Admin) (07 May 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) IRB Brasil Resseguros SA v CX Reinsurance Company Ltd [2010] EWHC 974 (Comm) (07 May… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Chapter V does expressly apply to the Crown but [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm
The post Case Review – Bird Construction Group v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:31 pm
Utah and later clarified in Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 5:54 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) issued a summary disposition in Lemelle v. [read post]
