Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
In Hameed v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
On February 20, 2024, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its opinion in Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Under s. 5.4(1), a judge shall order that the property be forfeited to the Crown if they determine that the property in question is indeed the property described under a s. 4(1)(b) order and is owned, held, or controlled by the person in question. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Background History and Legal Architecture for Domestic Use of the Military Experience with the British Crown caused the Framers to be wary of the establishment of a standing army. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:39 am
Kish v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
The Crown appeals to this Court as of right. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:10 pm
R v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:41 am
Part V covers “Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct”. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
The arrest here was unlawful and, therefore, must form part of the s. 24(2) analysis. [57] Accordingly, we reject the Crown and interveners’ view that we should adopt the approach set out by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in R. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 1:30 pm
A compounding indictable offence is a hybrid offence with a Crown election. [read post]
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Hunter v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Sunstein Administrative Law Scholars Amici Brief: SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm
In R v Hault, the court examines directly what the necessary intent, or mens rea, is, under s. 101, stating that the court must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual accused was aware that they committed the act, whether intentionally, with knowledge, recklessly, or with wilful blindness. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
In R v KDSA, 2009 NBPC 4, the Crown was required to prove that the explosive device was improvised, meaning a homemade device capable of exploding. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 11:38 am
This is a defence that states that the accused was wrongfully convicted. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am
(See R. v. [read post]
