Search for: "State v. Cuevas"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Interpreting contract language Local 589 v Cuevas, 271 AD2d 535 Using clear and unambiguous language in a collective bargaining agreement makes it easier for a court to resolve the meaning of a Taylor Law contract provision. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39548-7.11.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Concepcion on the validity of class action waivers Other speakers include my co-blogger Professor Jeff Sovern; Peggy Twohig and Leonard Chanin, two key officials responsible for standing up the CFPB; Tim Fernholz of the New America Foundation, who has written extensively on the CFPB; Dennis Cuevas of the National Association of Attorneys General; and representatives of state AG offices. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Not in the case of Cuevas v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:40 am
Yes, it may, as the Cuevas decision by the Appellate Division illustrates.Naptale Cuevas, a Mental Hygiene Therapy Aide employed by a State agency, was found guilty of abusing and threatening his supervisor with physical harm. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:30 am
Cuevas in Cuevas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
PERB reverts to its earlier “past-practice” analysis in determining “unit work”Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:21 am
PERB reverts to its earlier "past-practice" analysis in determining "unit work"Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 12:47 pm
Cuevas v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
State, No. 98,845 (Wyandotte)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (transfer); First degree murderChristopher Cuevas (argue); B. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 6:12 am
Cuevas-Gaspar v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:02 am
Editor: Compare United States v Cuevas, 496 F3d 256 (2nd Cir. 2007), in which the Appeallate court did not find that the US was limited by the defendant's extradition from the Dominican Republic, because there was insufficient evidence that the US had agreed to a sentencing cap. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:23 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 9:55 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:21 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:38 am
Juan Cuevas, defendant-appellant
U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 7:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
