Search for: "State v. Curry"
Results 41 - 60
of 403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 6:26 am
In a recent tax appeal before the Oregon Tax Court, CLP Elements LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:57 am
Facts: This case (Meyer et al v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 12:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
Curry County Board of Commissioners (10th Cir., June 25, 2015 -- persuasive) (very brief case upholding Billy's termination, based on failure-to-raise and lower court's "thorough opinions")Armelin v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 10:27 am
State, No. 4D12 556 (Fla. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:47 am
USA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:55 am
Curry v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal released a decision, Currie v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
(SSTL) in which Sistema owned about 56% stakes were declared illegal and quashed by a two judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India consisting of AK Ganguly & GS Singhvi, JJ. in Centre for PIL v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
It is the only Shakesepeare play I can think of where the epilogue, instead of trying to curry favor, shakes his fist at you and tells you to bugger off. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
It is the only Shakesepeare play I can think of where the epilogue, instead of trying to curry favor, shakes his fist at you and tells you to bugger off. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:03 pm
"Joe Shannon was born restless," Mike Cochran wrote in Texas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:23 am
Sneath, (3d Cir., Jan. 7, 2013), the 3rd Circuit rejected an inmate's claim that his 1st Amendment and RLUIPA free exercise rights were infringed when his Qur'an was taken from him during his cell transfer.In Curry v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:25 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:43 am
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
The case, Dada v. [read post]
