Search for: "State v. Daniel R."
Results 41 - 60
of 1,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:30 pm
Kebebew, Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v Bolivia): Is the International Court of Justice falling short? [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Charles R. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
R. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 2:27 am
Weidner and Daniel S. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A Dailge & Daniel V. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
In Jack Daniels v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
As Daniel A. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
Jordan—joined by House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) and House Administration Chair Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
