Search for: "State v. David A. King"
Results 41 - 60
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
David v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:34 am
Frank Cranmer: The Constitution Unit: Church and state in European monarchies, (4 May 2023). [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
(Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:40 pm
King. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
David Kotz has come under increasing fire from within the agency for allegedly instilling a climate of fear among employees in the organization. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
One of the most highly anticipated cases still outstanding is King v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Perhaps it would have been more like King Kong meets Lenin in October. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
The case of Coburn v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 10:04 am
*CIRCUIT COURTGroup 8 (Judge David Miller retiring)Jason Bloch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:51 am
As David Gibson reports in Politics Daily, Alabama's new governor Robert Bentley stated on Martin Luther King Day that he intended to be the governor of all the people, but if anybody had not accepted Jesus Christ as personal saviour, then you are "not my brother and not my sister. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
There was no tradition of the King appointing members to be King or to succeed the King. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:45 am
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Ethan Blevins responds to, and pushes back against, a “New York Times op-ed written by law professor William Baude [which] suggests that the Obama administration could just ignore the Supreme Court if it decides in King v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:34 am
Here are some of the seminal decisions they’ll cover: King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
"We are heirs to a tradition given voice 800 years ago by Magna Carta, which, on the barons' insistence, confined executive power by 'the law of the land,' " Justice David Souter declared in his concurring opinion in the landmark 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
Affirmed.Case Name: LASHAWN SIDNEY KING v. [read post]