Search for: "State v. David Barrett" Results 41 - 60 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2021, 6:18 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Maine church asks Supreme Court to block state from enforcing Covid restrictions due to Delta (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar have put forward an Intermediate View: the elected President is an "officer of the United States," but members of Congress are not. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:21 am by SHG
How did a unanimous, per curiam, opinion, as concurrer Justice Amy Coney Barrett, turn up the heat? [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton weighs in on the events that have followed the Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
He's posted a PDF of Jones v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Former LHB Guest Blogger Mary Ziegler, Florida State College of Law, discusses the history of the“fetal personhood” movement as part of a National Constitution Center podcast on Box v. [read post]
Opponents of a speedy confirmation have argued that, if confirmed, Judge Barrett will join with (at least) four other conservative justices to invalidate the ACA (whether in California v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So is David Strauss’s theory of common law constitutional adjudication. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]