Search for: "State v. David Harding"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
The following symposium, organized by Professors Mary Ziegler and David Schwartz, takes a hard look at the historical questions surrounding Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
”Given AIRC, it is hard to understand how four Justices would have granted review in the Pennsylvania postmark case. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
But 170, though impressive, is far short of the 270 votes necessary to prevail in the electoral college, and the so-called “compact”—I put it that way in order to highlight the fact that it is not at all clear, as a legal matter, that the agreement by the relevant states would be legally enforceable in the absence of congressional approval, which might be very hard to attain, especially in the egregious Senate—will not kick in at all unless… [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm
David Moncla, No. 110,549 (Sedgwick)Motion to correct illegal sentenceCarl Maughan[Affirmed; Beier; March 6, 2015]Unconstitutional hard-40 sentence was illegalJanuary 27--Tuesday--a.m.State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
He thinks hard about everything he does, insignificant or not, and he's not afraid to stick it to the state when they have it coming, even when there might be political ramifications. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
David Frederick began arguments for the state of Maine with a lengthy exchange with the Chief Justice and Justice Alito, both of whom were hard pressed to find a distinction between this case and Riegal v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
In ASARCO v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
The right of abortion is one of the most contentious political and legal issues in the United States today. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:04 am
David Kappos. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
A new book edited by Stanford Law School’s David Freeman Engstrom, the LSVF Professor in Law and co-director of the Deborah L. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm
In an important new Columbia Law Review article, legal scholars David S. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
” Notably, in Authors Guild v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
David Cassuto There’s little good here. [read post]
