Search for: "State v. David S. Frederick"
Results 41 - 60
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 5:31 pm
As referenced in the complaint, CVG-SAB contracts with Internet retail merchants including Tommy Bahama, Burlington Coat Factory, and Frederick’s of Hollywood. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:18 am
Frederick argued that the Court’s language in Napier was limited to state-law claims that only implicate a locomotive’s “fitness for service. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 332 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Walker v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:21 am
Monday’s oral argument in Merck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
On the other side, David Frederick is representing AFSCME today, just as he represented the National Education Association and its affiliate two terms ago in Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am
Kavanaugh pointed to a 1946 case, Social Security Board v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
Seth Waxman of Washington, D.C., and Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler will argue for the petitioner, and David Frederick of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
Justice Samuel Alito only raised the who-should-decide question near the end of the argument of David Frederick, who appeared on behalf of the respondents. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie hopes that in Janus v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
" Greenhouse and David D. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 8:01 am
We also had a great wrap up by Attorney David Frederick, the brilliant trial lawyer who argued and won the Weyth v Levine case before the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:57 pm
Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Rethinking Race, Sex and Marriage (2012) Same-Sex Marriage: Klarman, Michael, From the Closet to the Altar (2012) Mello, Michael, Legalizing Gay Marriage (2004) Moats, David, Civil Wars: A Battle for Gay Marriage (2004) Pierceson, Jason, Same-Sex Marriage in the United States (2013) Pinello, Daniel, America’s Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage (2006) Premarital Agreements: Dublin, Arlene, Prenups for Lovers: A Romantic Guide to Prenuptial… [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
David A. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:13 am
At oral argument on Tuesday in Janus Capital v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
David L. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
