Search for: "State v. David W. Free" Results 41 - 60 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Borrowing language from an earlier case, Kennedy affirmed that “[w]hether jury service be deemed a right, a privilege, or a duty, the State may no more extend it to some of its citizens and deny it to others on racial grounds than it may invidiously discriminate in the offering and withholding of the elective franchise. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
" Marc Jonathan Blitz has explored the intersection of free speech and privacy values in Stanley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Liberal, Confucian, and Socialist Theories of Enterprise Organization (and State, Family, and Personhood), (Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 37, p. 637, 2014).From SSRN (non-US law):Richard Moon, Religious Accommodation and Its Limits: The Recent Controversy at York University, (Constitutional Forum, Vol. 23, Forthcoming).Nathalie Des Rosiers, Free Religions or Freedom from Religion? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
Bennett (consolidated with Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
” Marc Jonathan Blitz has explored the intersection of free speech and privacy values in Stanley v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Indeed, this view is buttressed by the Supreme Court’s decision in another pre-RFRA Free Exercise case, Thomas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Rick Hills
But before you snigger at Norquist, consider the SCOTUS's failure in Arizona Free Enterprise Club's PAC v Bennett to distinguish Regan v Taxation With Representation. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
  The United States as amicus will  be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
All of these events are free and open to the public. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The defamation trial in Pannu v Carter was heard on 28 and 29 November 2017 by Sir David Eady   Judgment was reserved. [read post]