Search for: "State v. De Witt"
Results 41 - 60
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
We have previously written at length on decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), or State or Federal Courts on the classification of goods for customs purposes. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Conversely, Article IX of the Fundamental Law stated: “1. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
DRE The HistPhil forum on the Dartmouth College v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
Russia (I) (Just Satisfaction) Machiko Kanetake, María de los Ángeles González Carreño v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:09 am
From this perspective, the recent Teva v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:41 am
The Guidelines for Examination, Part F, V, 9, state that “no objection on account of lack of unity a priori is justified in respect of a dependent claim and the claim on which it depends, on the ground that the general concept they have in common is the subject-matter of the independent claim, which is also contained in the dependent claim”. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:30 pm
More from our authors: International Licensing Agreements: IP, Technology Transfer and Competition Law by Michala Meiselles, Hugo Wharton € 180 The Law of the European Union, Fifth Edition by eter Jan Kuijper, Fabian Amtenbrink, Deirdre Curtin, Bruno De Witte, Alison McDonnell, Stefaan van den Bogaert € 175 The post… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:06 am
More from our authors: International Licensing Agreements: IP, Technology Transfer and Competition Law by Michala Meiselles, Hugo Wharton € 180 The Law of the European Union, Fifth Edition by eter Jan Kuijper, Fabian Amtenbrink, Deirdre Curtin, Bruno De Witte, Alison McDonnell, Stefaan van den Bogaert € 175 The post… [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:14 pm
More from our authors: International Licensing Agreements: IP, Technology Transfer and Competition Law by Michala Meiselles, Hugo Wharton € 180 The Law of the European Union, Fifth Edition by eter Jan Kuijper, Fabian Amtenbrink, Deirdre Curtin, Bruno De Witte, Alison McDonnell, Stefaan van den Bogaert € 175 The post… [read post]
