Search for: "State v. Durbin"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
In this sense, the McGovern resolution could benefit from incorporating some of the measures in the Durbin-Portman proposal in the Senate, which provide the broader scope and more flexible terms of use demanded by the present crisis. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
” Behind Durbin sit five of the six DACA recipients who are named plaintiffs in the McAleenan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:35 am
”Executive Director of the National Whistleblower Center, John Kostyack, stated: “The National Whistleblower Center applauds the four Senators for introducing S.2529. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
Halleck (cable public access channel not a state actor); Criminal forfeiture, where used, should track lines of individual owner and asset responsibility, not the loose all-for-one joint-and-several-liability standards of some civil litigation [Trevor Burrus on Cato certiorari petition in Peithman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:33 am
"Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'" By "restructured," they mean packed with new Justices by a Democratic President and Senate after they kill the filibuster.CJLF takes no position on the underlying question in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 4:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 4:36 am
” Briefly: Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:28 pm
In what could be dubbed Project Fear, Democrats who want Collins and Murkowski to join them in opposing Kavanaugh’s confirmation will claim the judge will vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:02 am
Stephen Durbin and Associates and considered it a violation of the Solicitors Act, finding it a contingency fee arrangement under a different name. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
It clarifies the relationship between two conflicting statutes to encourage the foreign lending of art to the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Vera and Shaw v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm
Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
