Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 41 - 60
of 8,784
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Four types of financial institutions are required to comply with the fair access provisions of FL HB 3 (i.e., they are “in-scope”): “qualified public depositories” (“QPDs”), which are depository institutions designated by the Florida Chief Financial Officer (“Florida CFO”) as qualified to take Florida public deposits pursuant to Chapter 280 of the Florida Statues;[2] “financial institutions subject to the financial institutions… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
§ 274a.1(f)–(h). [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
Ford also offers a version of the 7.3 engine in select E-series vehicles. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
The F&A also found the date of injury under Lab. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
Dist. of Wash., 173 F.3d 713, 719 (9th Cir. 1999); see also United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am
United States, 136 F. [read post]